Q&A with Mira Rapp-Hooper

Q: Vanshika Thakur, Blogger of The Real Rectitude

A: Mira Rapp-Hooper, Indo-Pacific Strategy and U.S.–China Relations

Q1: How credible is Washington’s pledge to defend Taiwan if China attempts a blockade or coercion without firing a shot?

A: The credibility of U.S. commitments hinges on both political will and operational capacity. While Washington has repeatedly affirmed its support for Taiwan, deterrence relies on demonstrating a tangible ability to respond. Subtle coercion, such as economic or military pressure short of open conflict, tests these commitments in ways that are difficult to gauge publicly.

Q2: Could the Indo-Pacific resist Chinese influence without forming a formal “Asian NATO,” or is such an alliance inevitable?

A: A formal military alliance is not inevitable, but deeper coordination among like-minded states is essential. Many regional actors prefer flexible security partnerships to preserve autonomy while deterring coercion. The challenge is balancing collective security without provoking unnecessary escalation.

Q3: How do smaller Indo-Pacific countries navigate the U.S.–China rivalry while protecting their sovereignty?

A: These countries often employ hedging strategies, engaging economically with China while maintaining security ties with the U.S. or regional partners. Sovereignty is preserved through diversification of partnerships and careful diplomatic signaling. It’s a delicate balance between influence and autonomy.

Q4: What role does Japan, Australia, and India play in shaping regional security frameworks?A: They act as pivotal stabilizers and force multipliers, enhancing deterrence and signaling collective resolve. Their involvement strengthens interoperability with the U.S. while promoting regional norms. At the same time, their actions are closely watched by China, making transparency and predictability critical.

Q5: How might domestic politics in the U.S. affect Indo-Pacific strategy in the coming years?A: Shifts in Congress or the executive branch can recalibrate priorities, funding, and the willingness to respond to regional crises. Domestic political polarization may complicate long-term strategy and credibility. Allies and adversaries alike pay attention to these internal dynamics.

Closing Q: Are we entering a new era where the Indo-Pacific defines global power structures?

A: The region is increasingly central to global geopolitics. Its strategic importance, economic vitality, and security dynamics make it a defining arena for the coming decades. How states navigate this environment will influence not just regional, but global stability.